Your Salad Took a Road Trip: The Surprising Numbers Behind America’s Food Transportation System

Take a look at the produce in your refrigerator.

That head of lettuce, carton of strawberries, or bunch of spinach likely traveled farther than many people do on vacation before landing in your shopping cart.

Our modern food system is incredibly efficient, allowing us to enjoy fresh fruits and vegetables year-round regardless of the season. But that convenience comes with a fascinating logistical story. Every day, millions of trucks, trains, ships and airplanes move food across the United States, consuming enormous amounts of fuel along the way.

The numbers don’t lie.

Just How Far Does Our Food Travel?

The concept of “food miles” measures the distance food travels from where it’s grown to where it’s eaten.

According to research compiled by the National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT), fresh produce in the United States travels an average of more than 1,500 miles before reaching consumers. Processed foods average over 1,300 miles.

Some crops travel even farther.

Researchers at the former Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture examined produce arriving at Chicago’s wholesale market and found:

  • Lettuce traveled over 2,000 miles
  • Broccoli traveled over 2,000 miles
  • Spinach traveled over 2,000 miles
  • Grapes traveled over 2,000 miles

The average distance for the 30 produce items studied was 1,518 miles.

Those numbers aren’t surprising when you consider that much of America’s produce comes from concentrated growing regions like California’s Central Valley, Arizona’s Yuma region, Florida and Mexico before being distributed nationwide.

The Trucking Industry Does the Heavy Lifting

While railroads and ships play important roles in moving agricultural commodities, trucks handle the vast majority of fresh food distribution.

Refrigerated trailers transport everything from lettuce and berries to milk and frozen foods while maintaining carefully controlled temperatures throughout the journey.

A typical semi-truck averages approximately 6 to 7 miles per gallon of diesel fuel, depending on terrain, weather, weight and aerodynamics. That means a truck hauling produce 1,500 miles will burn roughly 215 to 250 gallons of diesel on that trip alone.

Now multiply that by thousands of trucks delivering food across America every day, and the scale becomes staggering.

America’s Food Freight Adds Up Fast

Transportation is only one piece of the food system, but it’s a significant one.

According to NCAT, transportation accounts for approximately 14% of the total energy used within the U.S. food system.

Researchers from the University of Michigan also found that while food transportation is extensive, the production of food itself accounts for a larger share of overall greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation contributes roughly 11% of food-related greenhouse gas emissions, while the production phase accounts for about 83%.

In other words, growing food requires far more energy than moving it, but transportation still represents a meaningful opportunity for improving efficiency.

Every Mile Costs Money

Fuel is one of the largest operating expenses for trucking companies.

If diesel costs $3.75 per gallon and a truck averages 6.5 mpg, fuel alone costs roughly 58 cents per mile.

A 1,500-mile shipment therefore requires approximately $865 worth of diesel fuel, and that’s not counting driver wages, equipment maintenance, refrigeration systems, insurance, tires, depreciation and distribution centers

Those transportation costs are ultimately reflected in the price consumers pay at the grocery store.

Local Production Is Gaining Attention

None of this means long-distance transportation is inherently bad.

Large-scale agriculture often benefits from ideal climates, economies of scale and highly efficient logistics. In some cases, producing food in the best growing region and transporting it efficiently can actually have a smaller environmental footprint than producing it locally under less favorable conditions.

However, there are situations where producing food closer to where it’s consumed offers meaningful advantages.

Local production can reduce transportation costs, decrease fuel consumption, shorten supply chains, preserve freshness, reduce spoilage (and therefore food waste), and increase resilience when disruptions occur

This is especially true for highly perishable crops like leafy greens, herbs and specialty vegetables.

A Different Approach to Food Production

As weather events, labor shortages, and transportation costs continue to challenge traditional agriculture, many organizations are rethinking where food should be grown.

Controlled environment agriculture, including hydroponic container farms, allows fresh produce to be grown directly where it’s needed, whether that’s outside a grocery store, beside a restaurant, on a school campus, or at a military installation.

Instead of shipping lettuce 1,500 miles across the country, it’s possible to harvest it just a few hundred feet away from where it will be eaten.

That’s not about replacing traditional agriculture. America’s large farming regions will always play a vital role in feeding the country.

But shortening the distance between harvest and plate can reduce transportation costs, improve freshness, strengthen local food security and make communities less vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.

In a world where nearly every tomato, head of lettuce and package of herbs has its own transportation story, sometimes the shortest journey is the most valuable one.

Fighting Back Against Hunger and Improving Food Access

“The world is at a critical juncture.”

That’s the headline of an article about the state of food security and nutrition in the world. In painstaking detail, the Food and Agriculture Organization at the United Nations uses the article to describe how the number of people affected by hunger globally increased in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

It estimates that between 720 million and 811 million people faced hunger. If you go with the middle of the projected range — around 768 million — 118 million more people faced hunger in 2020 than in 2019. How does this happen and what’s being done about it?

The Food and Agriculture Organization at the United Nations says that unless bold actions are taken to accelerate progress, especially actions to address major drivers of food insecurity and malnutrition and inequalities affecting access to food, hunger will not be eradicated by 2030, as the U.N. had hoped.

After remaining virtually unchanged from 2014 to 2019, the prevalence of undernourishment climbed to around 9.9 percent in 2020, from 8.4 percent a year earlier, the article says.

According to FoodBankNews.org, all of this activity is happening against a backdrop of heightened emphasis on nutrition from the USDA, which in mid-March released a report outlining its commitment to nutrition security (in addition to food security). The USDA noted the importance of nutrition in fighting diet-related disease, which is a leading cause of illness in the U.S., accounting for more than 600,000 deaths each year, or more than 40,000 each month.

Sadly, the pandemic continues to expose weaknesses in our food systems, especially when it comes to access. New farming practices, including controlled-environment agriculture, are increasingly being recognized as a potential solution to fill the gaps and avoid supply chain delays entirely. 

Strategically placing container farms in and around population centers could have a dramatic effect on providing a sustainable and secure source of nutrient-rich food. These farms can produce 200-300 pounds of fresh food weekly and help feed people in marginalized communities. They can also be used to help train the next generation of urban farmers and create jobs, providing ancillary benefits that can reverberate for years to come.

Drought, flood impacts create uncertainty for food producers

Drought, flood impacts create uncertainty for food producers

210114_Container Farming Desert_FINAL UPDATE-min

An alarming pattern has emerged in the farming industry over the last two decades, and experts believe the impact on food production won’t relent anytime soon.

A recent analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture shows that payouts to U.S. farmers for crops destroyed by droughts and flooding climbed by more than 340% between 1995 and 2020. During that time period, farmers received over $143.5 billion in federal crop insurance payments, according to the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit that analyzes research data and spotlights breakthrough findings to inform decisions that govern everyday life. 

While the conditions threaten the current livelihoods of farmers across the country, there are also intangible, permanent effects that can’t be ignored, such as the exodus of families who have been farming for decades and, in some cases, centuries. They’re simply giving up due to variables that are beyond their control. 

The EWG points out that while crop insurance provides a crucial safety net for farmers, the program is doing little to mitigate climate-related risks. Taxpayers pick up about 60% of premiums, which means farmers cover the other 40% to get a crop insurance policy. EWG says the “costs are expected to go up even more, as climate change causes even more unpredictable weather conditions,” according to an article on CommonDreams.org.  

This inevitability has decision-makers at the federal and state level considering drastic alternative measures, especially ones that help farmers adapt to changing conditions, enabling them to produce crops regularly without external factors.

One of those solutions is farming in controlled environments that eliminate outside impacts and promise reliable yields. Shipping containers are being repurposed and outfitted with a network of sensors and high-tech systems that regulate temperature, humidity, nutrient concentrations, watering and lighting. They enable farmers to grow food year-round — regardless of weather or climate — and drastically reduce the amount of water needed to grow crops, because the water is recycled and filtered and not lost to evaporation or transpiration.

“We see ourselves not as a replacement for traditional farming, but rather a tool that allows farmers to have that steady source of income throughout the year, without the stress,” said Rusty Walker, CEO of a Colorado-based company called FarmBox Foods, which designs, manufactures and sells enclosed hydroponic farms.

The containerized farms are also a critical element for crop production on islands, which currently import the vast majority of their food. The automated farms essentially add acreage to an island for the purpose of food production, cutting out potential supply chain issues and shipping costs that inflate food prices.

As Congress develops a new farm bill in 2023, the EWG is calling on lawmakers to consider focusing on “how to effectively fund farm programs so that farmers can adapt to and fight the climate crisis.”

FarmBox Foods Unveils Plans for Hydroponic Fodder Farm

FarmBox Foods is developing a hydroponic fodder farm that will be sold beginning this year. It will produce roughly 1,000 pounds of fodder per day.

FarmBox Foods Unveils Plans for Hydroponic Fodder Farm

hydroponic fodder farm
Fodder is used as a dietary supplement for livestock, including beef cattle and dairy cows. Just look how much that cow on the left is enjoying it!